Subject: Re: [xsl] Testing 2 XML documents for equality - a solution From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:21:48 -0500 |
> > Any activity to > >solve an undefined problem is groundless and imaginary -- something > >like hallucination. > > I can accept this provisionally, leaving aside a discussion of what we > should mean by "groundless", "imaginary", and "hallucination". (Though > perhaps not on XSL-List. :-) Whether any such activity is a waste of time > is, however, another question.
I cannot see where I said it was waste of time ?
The main problem in this thread is to define the problem.
<div> <p>By 1997, best practices in the SGML industry were well understood....</p> <p>Work on XML started in earnest in 1997...</p> </div>
<div> <p>Work on XML started in earnest in 1997...</p> <p>By 1997, best practices in the SGML industry were well understood....</p> </div>
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Testing 2 XML documents f, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Testing 2 XML documents f, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: Re[2]: [xsl] Transformation usi, M. David Peterson | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl list item writes ove, Eliot Kimber |
Month |