Subject: Re: [xsl] testing for string and number in XSLT 2.0 was Re: [xsl] Test For Numeric Values? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:37:23 +0100 |
> the fact that BASIC conformance meant XML Schema datatypes are still > being used completely went under my radar...so I now understand that > value for BASIC conformance is directed towards implementators... a full xslt system can use user-defined schema types defined in an xsd schema schmea a basic system can not use schema defined complex types at all and is restricted to a fixed set of basic atomic types (a subset of the schema built in types) similarly a full system can "see" type annotations on elements that have been added by a schema aware parser, so you can match elemets that have a particular (perhaps user defined) type. In a basic schema all elements are annotated as not having been typed by a schema processor. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] testing for string and nu, James Fuller | Thread | RE: [xsl] testing for string and nu, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] testing for string and nu, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | [xsl] viewing as a html, T UmaShankari |
Month |