Subject: RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output encoding ? From: JBryant@xxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:56:54 -0500 |
Then I'd like to ask that it remain implementation-specific, so that I can keep getting plain text when I run my tools from the command line. I don't need a bunch of goobledygook cluttering up my debugging messages. Jay Bryant Bryant Communication Services (presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies) Kevin Rodgers <kevin.rodgers@xxxxxxx> 04/08/2005 04:48 PM Please respond to xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc Subject RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output encoding ? Michael Kay writes: > > Can we specify the output encoding for xsl:message ? > > Everything about the output of xsl:message is implementation-defined. So you > need to ask the question in relation to a specific product. Then I would like to formally petition the working group to specify that the serialization of xsl:message should respect the xsl:output declaration, just like the serialization of the result document. How do I go about that? -- Kevin Rodgers
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output, Kevin Rodgers | Thread | RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output, Kevin Rodgers |
RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output, Kevin Rodgers | Date | RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output, Kevin Rodgers |
Month |