Re: [xsl] Measuring the complexity of XSLT stylesheets

[Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>]

http://www.sei.cmu.edu/str/descriptions/cyclomatic_body.html


Cyclomatic Complexity (McCabe)
Measures the number of linearly-independent paths through a program module

Halstead Complexity Measures
Algorithmic complexity, measured by counting operators and operands


Henry and Kafura metrics
Coupling between modules (parameters, global variables, calls)


Bowles metrics
Module and system complexity; coupling via parameters and global variables


Troy and Zweben metrics
Modularity or coupling; complexity of structure (maximum depth of
structure chart); calls-to and called-by


Ligier metrics
Modularity of the structure chart



Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev

On 4/18/05, Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm writing a paper where I'm evaluating different XML vocabularies
> for expressing the same information, and one of my evaluation criteria
> is how easily the resulting XML can be processed with XSLT. At the
> moment the paper contains only prose with a subjective appraisal of
> the various approaches. This is fine, as far as it goes, but it would
> be nice to have something more objective to back it up with. Are there
> any established criteria for evaluating the complexity of XSLT
> stylesheets?
>
> There are some obvious criteria I could think of, like:
>
> - size of stylesheet in bytes, lines, and XML elements+attributes,
>
> - number of elements from the XSLT namespace, and
>
> - combined length (in characters) of XPath expressions.
>
> I think these criteria would work, but I'm not convinced that they
> really capture complexity directly. Can anyone suggest better
> alternatives?
>
> --
> Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
> GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >