Subject: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:20:22 +0200 |
Hi, On mar, 2005-04-19 at 09:57 +0200, James Fuller wrote: > I wont make an arguement for such a bastard child...but it does save a > few cycles Hmmm... I must be missing something, but I don't see how "document(fn:namespace-uri(.))" saves cycles compared to "document(@lnk)"! Furthermore, your trick requires that you use namespaces in your instance documents which you might have been able to avoid without it and these namespaces do add many cycles (for instance imposing that you use prefixes in all your XPath expressions). > and its usage within XSLT is pretty elegant. Isn't it very subjective :-) ? Personally, I wouldn't call using XSLT 2.0 "elegant" at all ! Eric -- Le premier annuaire des apiculteurs 100% XML! http://apiculteurs.info/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com (ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Na, James Fuller | Thread | Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Na, M. David Peterson |
RE: [xsl] Mike Kay's tip 8 how to u, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Na, M. David Peterson |
Month |