<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)
From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:30:31 +0200
Dimitre Novatchev wrote:

> What is really not elegant at all in XSLT 2.0 is the impossibility to
> define user data types inline in a stylesheet  -- forcing the
> programmer to artificially separate in different files type definition
> from type usage makes XSLT 2.0 rather unique... :(
>
> Of course, one would also like to see nested sequences, type classes
> and type equations...

Maybe XSLT 2.0 is just temporary language which will be shortly
superseded by something called Haskslt or HasXSLT :-D

--
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Jirka Kosek     e-mail: jirka@xxxxxxxx     http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Profesionalnm 9kolenm a poradenstvm v oblasti technologim XML.
      Podmvejte se na na9 novl spu9tln} web http://DocBook.cz
        Podrobn} pxehled 9kolenm http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
[xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which, Dimitre Novatchev Thread Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jeni Tennison
[xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which, Dimitre Novatchev Date Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jeni Tennison
Month