Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)

[Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jeni,

On 4/19/05, Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dimitre,
>
> > What is really not elegant at all in XSLT 2.0 is the impossibility to
> > define user data types inline in a stylesheet  -- forcing the
> > programmer to artificially separate in different files type definition
> > from type usage makes XSLT 2.0 rather unique... :(
>
> Since the November 2004 Working Draft, you can nest a (WXS) schema
> within an <xsl:import-schema> element, so you can define data types
> within the stylesheet module if you want. This only applies to
> Schema-Aware XSLT processors, of course.


Then we have two quite different languages.


Cheers,
Dimitre.


>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeni
>
> ---
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com/