Re: [xsl] Java Transformation

Subject: Re: [xsl] Java Transformation
From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:07:14 -0600
> No - you are not alone!

You are so VERY not alone!  Google deserves a lot of credit for
standing up to a world full of icons and symbols and instead
showcasing the power that has existed in text since (anyone care to
throw a number in here?)  Not that a lot of us were not already aware
of this, prefering to shell our way into Vi before double clicking 4
symbolic levels of folders and files and whatever else might be
standing in between us and the file we want before being allowed
access to it.  But without Google showcasing the fact that there was
just as much profit (if not more) in text as their was in the Flashing
christmas tree light ads of the mide late 90's, building success
around such a simplistic and cost effective technique I can only
imagine the Flash-based hell we would be living in had they not chosen
such a bold approach to their business model.

On 21 Apr 2005 20:10:09 +0100, Colin Paul Adams
<colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>    Michael> Personally, I can never remember what all the symbols on
>    Michael> the diagrams actually mean:
>
> Tool-tips give the game away here - what's the point of graphical
> symbols, when you need a textual reminder as to what they mean.
>
>    Michael> other people seem to like them so it must just be me.
>
> No - you are not alone!
> --
> Colin Paul Adams
> Preston Lancashire
>
>


--
<M:D/>

:: M. David Peterson ::
XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages Specialist

Current Thread