<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl:sort

Subject: Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl:sort
From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:57:02 -0400
Michael Kay wrote:

Me too. Turing completeness is not the same as closure over the data model.
To take an obvious example, there is no way of creating a result tree that
contains an unparsed entity, even though the data model allows unparsed
entities to exist.

Closure only implies that you never create anything not in the set; not that you can create everything in the set.

--
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, David Carlisle Thread RE: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, Michael Kay
Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, David Carlisle Date Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, Dimitre Novatchev
Month