Subject: RE: [xsl] Recognized Unicode characters? From: "Edward Bryant" <bryant_edward@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 08:08:47 -0500 |
Thanks for responding, but I think you guys lost me. Here is the xslt header info I used:
> > > Shouldn't that be <xsl:output encoding="US-ASCII"... for safety? > > > > Neither is completely safe of course, >
The spec only requires support for UTF-8 and UTF-16, anything else is optional.
I personally use "iso-646" as the name of this encoding. The differences are
immaterial (different names for some of the characters, I believe) but I
prefer international standards as a matter of principle.
Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Recognized Unicode charac, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] Recognized Unicode charac, Geert Josten |
Re: [xsl] Is XSLT a suitable soluti, Geert Josten | Date | Re: [xsl] Do Templates Conflict?, Edward Bryant |
Month |