Subject: [xsl] Wellknown facts about browser support of XSLT (Was: Re: [xsl] xsl:variable with hex color values) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 06:09:35 +1000 |
Maybe to avoid such long threads in the future and ultimately save time for everybody, the FAQ for the xsl-list should include the fact that at present IE 6 uses MSXML 3, Firefox/Netscape uses TransforMiiX, which even does not have support for the xxx:node-set() extension function. Safari supports XSLT 1.0 via libxslt. All this is XSLT 1.0. So, in short, no known browser today has support for XSLT 2.0 (and this is logically due to the fact that there isn't any XSLT 2.0 W3 recommendation yet). and also include this link: http://www.w3schools.com/xml/xml_browsers.asp which hopefully will be kept up-to-date in the future. Probably, it would be a good idea to specify the varying degree to which each of these platforms has some support for EXSLT. Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev On 5/23/05, Rolando Isidoro <rli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Michael Kay wrote: > > >XMLSpy includes an XSLT 1.0 processor and a 2.0 processor. Which one did you > >select? > > > I've looked into several options under XMLSpy but couldn't find which > one was selected. Meanwhile I read your other mail and decided to change > the XSL document and write the solution in XSLT 1.0 as you pointed some > mails before and it worked out, so it figures out that the browsers I'm > using (Firefox and IE) don't have XSLT 2.0 processors. > > Thanks for all the help, Rolando.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl:variable with hex col, Rolando Isidoro | Thread | Re: [xsl] Wellknown facts about bro, Mulberry Technologie |
Re: [xsl] xsl:variable with hex col, Rolando Isidoro | Date | Re: [xsl] Wellknown facts about bro, Mulberry Technologie |
Month |