Subject: Re: [xsl] configuring a conditional From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:43:43 -0400 |
I think this has be a test on the preceding:: axis -- though maybe someone can think of a way to do it that wouldn't be so expensive, potentially.
That is, an ibid would be when @linkend = preceding::biblioref[1]/@linkend. In the simple case.
I'm not sure if I understand the logic you want here, however. Is the second doe99 an ibid even though it's in a footnote?
Why is the third doe99 not an ibid, or if it is, is it by virtue of "directly following" the first doe99 or the second?
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] configuring a conditional, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] configuring a conditional, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] configuring a conditional, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] configuring a conditional, Wendell Piez |
Month |