Subject: RE: [xsl] Anybody know when "transform" became the term for the type ofthing XSL From: "Aron Bock" <aronbock@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:52:25 +0000 |
Scripting implies (at least to me) telling an external entity (a web browser, an office application, an os shell) a sequence of actions it should perform, which is very different from the declarative style of XSLT.
Because I think it devalues XSLT to call it a script. Ok, it's interpreted rather than compiled and it's relatively small but 'script'? That's horrible. Just my opinion.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Anybody know when "transf, Kirkham, Pete (UK) | Thread | [xsl] New to XPCOM, Anish Gmail |
RE: [xsl] How to output <xsl:messag, Dan | Date | RE: [xsl] Filtering XML elements ba, Aron Bock |
Month |