Subject: Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentHandler From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:59:20 +0530 |
On 8/10/05, Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As an alternative, what if the User defines explicit methods like > > public void startEmployee() [simplified here- ignoting namespace mappings] > public void endEmployee() > public void onEmptyAdddress() > public void onAttr_Employee_Name() [this is just illustrative of the > attributes scenario.] Hi Menon, SAX does'nt have this architecture. Regards, Mukul > rgds, > Menon > > -- > Shift to the left, shift to the right! > Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte! > > -Ramkumar Menon > A typical Macroprocessor
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] User defined SAX ContentHandl, Ramkumar Menon | Thread | Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentH, Ramkumar Menon |
[xsl] User defined SAX ContentHandl, Ramkumar Menon | Date | Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentH, Ramkumar Menon |
Month |