Subject: Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentHandler From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:06:56 +0530 |
Hi Menon, As I said earlier, I don't think this is feasible. We cannot have a SAX like driver for each custom application. Its like Cars have Tiers. But can Tiers have Cars? Regards, Mukul On 8/10/05, Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Mukul, > > I have only thought of this from the usage perspective. Implementation > is far outside the horizon as of now. > Since I am not a Guru in the parsing domain, I really cant make > statements or observations on it's feasibility issues.Why dont you let > me know the issues that you anticipate ? > > rgds, > Menon > > On 8/10/05, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Menon, > > Can you tell what implementation ideas you have in mind? It seems > > to me you want to write a SAX like driver for each custom application. > > I am doubtful if this can be feasible. > > > > Regards, > > Mukul > > > > On 8/10/05, Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Mukul, > > > > > > Sorry if I hadnt been clear enough, but I wasnt proposing this to > > > abide by SAX architecture . > > > This is just another way of doing things that SAX does in its own way. > > > > > > cheers! > > > Menon > > > > > > > -- > Shift to the left, shift to the right! > Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte! > > -Ramkumar Menon > A typical Macroprocessor
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentH, Ramkumar Menon | Thread | Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentH, Elliotte Harold |
Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentH, Ramkumar Menon | Date | Re: [xsl] Exsl str:replace template, James Fuller |
Month |