Subject: RE: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentHandler From: "Aron Bock" <aronbock@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:43:45 +0000 |
From: Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@xxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentHandler Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:51:00 +0530
Hi All,
W3C defines specific methods witihn a SA ContentHandler like startElement(), endElement() etc... that would be called back when elements are encountered within the XML Document. User overrides these methods to define the logic within each of these callback methods.
As an alternative, what if the User defines explicit methods like
public void startEmployee() [simplified here- ignoting namespace mappings] public void endEmployee() public void onEmptyAdddress() public void onAttr_Employee_Name() [this is just illustrative of the attributes scenario.]
Advantage -----------------
Cleaner separation of logic. <<add here>>
Disadvantages ---------------------
No Clear contract. <<add here>>
This is only an ilustrative subset of the functionalty. What do you folks think of this ? Is this a better alternative ?
rgds, Menon
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentH, Elliotte Harold | Thread | Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentH, Alan |
Re: [xsl] defining nodes to apply t, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] Evaluating XSLT2 from code, Andrew Sharpe |
Month |