RE: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentHandler

["Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

A very early version of Saxon provided this kind of capability; you could
nominate the method to be called for each element node by supplying a
pattern, like an XSLT pattern. The method wouldn't be startEmployee, it
would be startElement in an EmployeeHandler class. So it's quite viable, and
can be built as a layer above SAX; it just never caught on.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ramkumar Menon [mailto:ramkumar.menon@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 10 August 2005 07:21
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentHandler
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> W3C defines specific methods witihn a SA ContentHandler like
> startElement(), endElement() etc... that would be called back when
> elements are encountered within the XML Document.
> User overrides these methods to define the logic within each of these
> callback methods.
> 
> As an alternative, what if the User defines explicit methods like
> 
> public void startEmployee() [simplified here- ignoting 
> namespace mappings]
> public void endEmployee()
> public void onEmptyAdddress()
> public void onAttr_Employee_Name() [this is just illustrative of the
> attributes scenario.]
> 
> Advantage
> -----------------
> 
> Cleaner separation of logic.
> <<add here>>
> 
> Disadvantages
> ---------------------
> 
> No Clear contract.
> <<add here>>
> 
> This is only an ilustrative subset of the functionalty.
> What do you folks think of this ? Is this a better alternative ?
> 
> rgds,
> Menon
> 
> -- 
> Shift to the left, shift to the right!
> Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!
> 
> -Ramkumar Menon
>  A typical Macroprocessor