Subject: [xsl] Re: avoiding disable-output-escaping, how to output M$ wierd syntax From: iwantto keepanon <iwanttokeepanon@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:59:01 +0400 (MSD) |
Jon Gorman writes: > Ummm, since this comment is a "comment" you can certainly code it like > any other comment. (If that makes any sense) > > Even though it makes me quesy, it should be possible to write this > just as a comment. > >> <xsl:text disable-output-escaping="yes"><!--[if IE]></xsl:text> >> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/~rodney/times/css/ieonly.css" media="screen" /> >> <xsl:text disable-output-escaping="yes"><![endif]--></xsl:text> > > as the comment that it really desires to be should just be: > > <xsl:comment>[if IE]><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" > href="/~rodney/times/css/ieonly.css" media="screen" > /><![endif]</xsl:comment> Well, the link element gets parsed as a node and the comment output does not have any link in it. It (xsltproc) also tries to parse "<![endif]" and pukes on the ! in the element name. It would also puke if it ever got to the missing >. But a little modification give this: <xsl:comment><![CDATA[[if IE]><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/~rodney/times/css/ieonly.css" media="screen" /><![endif]]]></xsl:comment> which does produce the same output. But I'm not sure this is better markup than using "disable-output-escaping". Specifically, if I had to use variables inside the CDATA section; I'd be up a creek.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Diferent behaviour using , Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: avoiding disable-outp, Wendell Piez |
[xsl] Diferent behaviour using docu, António Mota | Date | [xsl] Re: Diferent behaviour using , António Mota |
Month |