Subject: Re: [xsl] Are nodes atomic values? From: António Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 17:18:02 +0100 |
Ok, thanks. Quoting a popular characater, "oh well, back to the old drawing board"... On 9/9/05, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > By atomic i meant it's greek meaning of "indivisible". > > yes I suspected that (in which case the answer is yes) but I wasn't > sure if you were refering to the defined term "atomic value" in XPath2 > (in which case the answer is no, atomic values as defined by xpath2 > consist of integers, strings, dates etc, but explictly not nodes) > > > so it can't select something that doesn't > > exist, so what i want is not possible. > > correct. > > David > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Are nodes atomic values?, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Are nodes atomic values?, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Are nodes atomic values?, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl grouping problem, Mukul Gandhi |
Month |