Re: [xsl] attribute test

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] attribute test

Subject: Re: [xsl] attribute test
From: Jon Gorman <jonathan.gorman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:30:02 -0500

Ack, been hit by the stolen words gnomes"

This
> (not() is negation.  When working with node sets and equality (=,!=) I
believe
> XPath  returns true if there is any node in the node set that satisifies
the
> condition.


> I was kinda wondering how that solution was working but figured
> perhaps my brain was scrambled today as well ;).

Well, apparently it is at least partially scrambled.

Jon Gorman

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] attribute test, (continued) Spencer Tickner - Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:46:03 -0800 Spencer Tickner - Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:03:38 -0800 Joris Gillis - Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:22:33 +0200 Jon Gorman - Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:27:37 -0500 Jon Gorman - Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:30:02 -0500 <= Spencer Tickner - Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:18:14 -0800 David Carlisle - Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:29:09 +0100 Jon Gorman - Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:30:15 -0500 Jon Gorman - Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:40:43 -0500

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] attribute test, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] attribute test, Jon Gorman	Thread	Re: [xsl] attribute test, Spencer Tickner
Re: [xsl] attribute test, Jon Gorman	Date	Re: [xsl] attribute test, Spencer Tickner
	Month