Subject: Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identity rule? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:15:41 +1000 |
On 21 Sep 2005 22:10:14 +0100, Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Dimitre> As a consequence, I think that it would be very helpful > Dimitre> to have in XSLT facilities, which provide warning > Dimitre> diagnostics whenever a built-in template rule is invoked, > Dimitre> or to turn off built-in template rules at all. > > Dimitre> Probably vendors of XSLT processors could provide such > Dimitre> facilities? > > The former is easy to do (but should not be on by default, as it would > annoy too many people). > The latter is equally easy, but is non-compliant behaviour. So it must > be a non-default option. In which case, I think the warning is better. > > But why limit your request to vendors? Wouldn't you prefer free > software XSLT processors also to have such an option? Colin, Pardon my bad English, but for me you are also a "vendor", and a "free vendor" :o) of an XSLT processor. Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identit, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identit, Evan Lenz |
Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identit, Colin Paul Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identit, Evan Lenz |
Month |