RE: [xsl] Templates with same name but different argument param names

Subject: RE: [xsl] Templates with same name but different argument param names
From: "Kevin L. Cobb" <kevin.cobb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:34:57 -0400
I apoligize to all for the inconvenience.
I have a tendancy to treat the list as a sounding board which is an
incorrect use.

-Kevin



-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 9:19 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [xsl] Templates with same name but different argument param
names

The XSLT 1.0 spec doesn't say very much in section 6, Named Templates

http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#named-templates

, but it does say this:

It is an error if a stylesheet contains more than one template with the
same name and same import precedence.

You indicated you weren't sure whether this was a valid question for the
list. I think that before asking *any* question on the list, you should
take some steps to find out the answer from reference sources. If you
can't find the answer, then it becomes a valid question.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin L. Cobb [mailto:kevin.cobb@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 22 September 2005 14:03
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [xsl] Templates with same name but different argument param
> names
>
> Wonderng what the outcome of this scenario would be in XSLT and hoping

> that the old saying that there are NO stupid questions is in play on
> this list ;)
>
>
>
> <xsl:template name="lookupValue">
>    <xsl:param name="fieldID"/>
>
>    <!-- Lookup the code using the filedID --> </xsl:template>
>
> <xsl:template name="lookupValue">
>    <xsl:param name="facilityID"/>
>
>    <!-- Lookup the code using the facilityID
> 	  different logic here  -->
> </xsl:template>
>
>
> Will specifying the parameter names differently (fieldID versus
> facilityID) in two templates that have the same name essentailly make
> these two templates distinct? Getting ready to test the theory but
> thought I would bust off a quick e-mail to the list first.
>
> -Kevin

Current Thread