Re: [xsl] Performance

[Andrew Franz <afranz0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

How about this?

....
<xsl:variable name="inc"><xsl:apply-templates select="*" /></xsl:variable>
<br/>count is: <xsl:value-of 
select="string-length(normalize-space($inc))" />
</xsl:template>

<xsl:template match="*[not(starts-with(name(), 'DGBUIMSNNumber'))]" 
priority="+1" />
<xsl:template match="*[@action='default']">d</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="*[@action='add']">a</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="*" />


Khorasani, Houman wrote:

> I just have noticed 
>
> This way of writing the code is much faster
>
> count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber')][@action='add'])
>
> than this way:
>
> count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber') and @action='add'])
>
>
> Why is that?
>
>
> And how do I write this piece of code like the above in the 'faster'
> way?
>
> count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber') and (@action='default' or
> @action='add')])
>
>
> Because this would imply I had two 'and' instead of one 'and' and one
> 'or' correct?
>
> count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber')][@action='default'][@action
> ='add'])
>
>
> Regards
> Houman