Subject: Re: [xsl] Recursion problem with Firefox From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 13:25:00 GMT |
Can someone confirm the problem I described http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200511/msg00059.html to be reproducible? Or is it just me? It is reproducible, although oddly the version of your stylesheet as appears in the archives is not well formed: * every declaration of the xhtml namespace is followed by a spurious ";" (incidentally you don't need most of those declarations) * the text This is my input file (abbreviated): appears _before_ /xsl:stylesheet not after it. Neither of these problems appears to be in your original mail, so the list archives mail-to-html filter seems to have been confused. You say > But what can be limited to less than 5k ? It's a processor bug (if it hits some memory limit it ought to fail rather than just give the wrong answer) so you'd need to report it to their bugzilla system. I doubt it has anything to do with file _size_ but rather with recursion depth. Your template is a non-tail recursive template and presumably you hit some stack overflow around 60 level of recursion (which seems rather low, but in practice most systems will have _some_ finite limit on recursion stack). David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Recursion problem with Fi, Manfred Staudinger | Thread | Re: [xsl] Recursion problem with Fi, Mulberry Technologie |
RE: [xsl] XML fragment as a param ?, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Recursion problem with Fi, Emmanouil Batsis |
Month |