Subject: Re: [xsl] parsing a complex xml tree into simple trees (a challenging problem at least for me :) From: drkm <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:21:00 +0100 (CET) |
David Carlisle wrote: > <xsl:param name="a" select=".//text()[contains(.,',')][1]"/> > would be better as > descendant::text()[contains(.,',')][1] > which does what I intended (select the first node with a comma) > although actually i think it doesn't make any difference here > as $a is always used where XSLT1's implied first-node semantics > will mean that the extra nodes that are selected when // is used > don't do any harm. Mmh. I don't understand what's the difference between the two expressions. You say that in the first one, the result is a node-set which count() may be greater than 1, with the test "[1]". Could you please explain a bit further? Thanks, --drkm ___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Tilichargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] parsing a complex xml tre, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] parsing a complex xml tre, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Continuously add to a par, Jon Gorman | Date | RE: [xsl] Continuously add to a par, Emil Soosaithasan |
Month |