Subject: Re: [xsl] sorted for-each: preceding::sibling is not in sort order From: Ferdinand Soethe <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:59:09 +0100 |
Thank you all for your insights. At least now I know that didn't miss anything. Michael wrote: > XSLT 2.0 allows you to use xsl:sequence > instead of xsl:copy-of, so you can construct a variable whose value is a > sequence of nodes (node references) without making copies of the nodes. Wouldn't I once again have the problem with preceding::sibling when they are references? -- Ferdinand Soethe
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] sorted for-each: precedin, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] sorted for-each: precedin, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Pointer to a good explana, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] sorted for-each: precedin, Michael Kay |
Month |