Re: [xsl] sorted for-each: preceding::sibling is not in sort order

Subject: Re: [xsl] sorted for-each: preceding::sibling is not in sort order
From: Ferdinand Soethe <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:59:09 +0100
Thank you all for your insights. At least now I know that didn't miss
anything.

Michael wrote:

> XSLT 2.0 allows you to use xsl:sequence
> instead of xsl:copy-of, so you can construct a variable whose value is a
> sequence of nodes (node references) without making copies of the nodes.

Wouldn't I once again have the problem with
preceding::sibling when they are references?

--
Ferdinand Soethe

Current Thread