Subject: Re: [xsl] second implementation of XSLT 2.0? From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:29:11 -0500 |
There are advancing XSL-T implementations as mentioned in this thread, but I don't see how running a transform or two with each engine answers the questions of interest: whether they are interoperable, and that the specification is implementable.
-- o;?Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] second implementation of , Frans Englich | Thread | Re: [xsl] second implementation of , Jim Melton |
RE: [xsl] second implementation of , Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Replacing strings, Sven Waibel |
Month |