Subject: Re: [xsl] Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw Java code" From: Geert Josten <Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:16:23 +0100 |
On 11/30/05, Karr, David <david.karr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I know this is a completely open question, but what kind of experience have people had comparing the runtime performance and throughput of XSLT vs. "raw Java code"?
To ask a stupid question, I'm not really sure what you mean by "raw Java code" here. Do you mean processing the xml file via other mechanims (raw text processing, SAX, DOM, etc) or are you just talking about "compiled" scripts vs uncompiled scripts? Bytecod issues?
Don't forget after all that there are XSLT processors that aren't Java based. Would you compare xsltproc against ...something?
Sorry, a bit tired today and my brain keeps trying to figure this out.
Jon Gorman
-- Drs. G.P.H. Josten Consultant
Daidalos BV Source of Innovation Hoekeindsehof 1-4 2665 JZ Bleiswijk Tel: +31 (0) 10 850 1200 Fax: +31 (0) 10 850 1199 www.daidalos.nl
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Experiences comparing per, Jon Gorman | Thread | [xsl] Match the element that have c, Jacob Friis Saxberg |
Re: [xsl] Error: when distance betw, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | [xsl] XSL-List Guidelines, Mulberry Technologie |
Month |