Re: [xsl] Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw Java code"

Subject: Re: [xsl] Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw Java code"
From: Geert Josten <Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:16:23 +0100
Not to forget parsers that generate 'native code' out of stylesheets before executing them.


Jon Gorman wrote:

On 11/30/05, Karr, David <david.karr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

I know this is a completely open question, but what kind of experience
have people had comparing the runtime performance and throughput of XSLT
vs. "raw Java code"?

To ask a stupid question, I'm not really sure what you mean by "raw
Java code" here.  Do you mean processing the xml file via other
mechanims (raw text processing, SAX, DOM, etc) or are you just talking
about "compiled" scripts vs uncompiled scripts?  Bytecod issues?

Don't forget after all that there are XSLT processors that aren't Java
based. Would you compare xsltproc against ...something?

Sorry, a bit tired today and my brain keeps trying to figure this out.

Jon Gorman

-- Drs. G.P.H. Josten Consultant

Daidalos BV
Source of Innovation
Hoekeindsehof 1-4
2665  JZ  Bleiswijk
Tel: +31 (0) 10 850 1200
Fax: +31 (0) 10 850 1199

De informatie - verzonden in of met dit emailbericht - is afkomstig van Daidalos BV en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onbedoeld hebt ontvangen, verzoeken wij u het te verwijderen. Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.

Current Thread