Subject: Re: [xsl] Exclude by Sibling Condition From: Michael B Allen <mba2000@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:43:23 -0500 |
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 08:45:47 -0600 JBryant@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > <xsl:for-each select="page[not(@tab=following::page/@tab)]"> > <!-- Process the nodes you selected here --> > </xsl:for-each> > > From a human readability point of view, that's three lines shorter and > keeps the selection syntax in the for-each, so that the interior of the > for-each is purely how to process a node that matched the selection > criteria. So, to me, that's cleaner and easier to follow. Indeed. Actually I didn't consider your method because it selects: <page name="p2" tab="products"/> <page name="d" tab="downloads"/> <page name="s" tab="support"/> Rather than: <page name="p0" tab="products"/> <page name="d" tab="downloads"/> <page name="s" tab="support"/> But looking closer I can see that simply replacing 'following' with 'preceding' appears to generate the above correctly. Thanks, Mike
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Exclude by Sibling Condit, JBryant | Thread | Re: [xsl] Exclude by Sibling Condit, Ragulf Pickaxe |
RE: [xsl] Comparing XML, xsl:normal, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Finding deepest node, marcus |
Month |