Subject: Re: [xsl] Grouping From: Ragulf Pickaxe <ragulf.pickaxe@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:58:08 +0100 |
Hi again, > I take back my previous post as I don't see where I am wrong. > The muenchian grouping is not required for the answers and only for the > questions that too only if the OP is prticular about it. > > Otherwise, my code should work fine. Yes, your solution would work fine on the input given by the OP (is OP for Original Poster?). My point was that if the question_id's where not ordered, then I think that your answer would not work, for example: <recordset> <row> <question_id>1</question_id> <answer>1: blah blah blah...</answer> </row> <row> <question_id>2</question_id> <answer>2: blah blah blah...</answer> </row> <row> <question_id>1</question_id> <answer>3: blah blah blah...</answer> </row> <row> <question_id>2</question_id> <answer>4: blah blah blah...</answer> </row> ...etc... </recordset> And now that I think about it, would: <xsl:value-of select="key('rec', question_id)/answer"/> not give only the first row/answer element with a given question_id, no matter the current row element? As I said, if I am wrong in my assumptions on how the language work, I would be grateful for clarification. Regards, Ragulf Pickaxe :-)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Grouping, omprakash . v | Thread | Re: [xsl] Grouping, omprakash . v |
Re: [xsl] Grouping, omprakash . v | Date | Re: [xsl] Grouping, omprakash . v |
Month |