Subject: Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty? From: Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:58:40 +1100 |
On 12/12/05 11:02 AM, "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So, it would seem the serialiser I'm using is defective, yes? >> Sadly, I don't >> think I have a choice in the matter, since I'm using the built in XSLT >> functionality of Filemaker. > > Start by finding out which XSLT processor Filemaker is using: > > <xsl:comment>Generated using: > <xsl:value-of select="system-property('xsl:vendor')"/> > </xsl:comment> <!--Generated using: Apache Software Foundation--> feh. doing a search at filemaker.com turned up references to "XALAN-based" and "XERCES-based". > Don't this tool permit you to change the XSLT processor to be used? > So you could use a correct implementation. sadly no. e.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, drkm |
RE: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] XSL to generate required outp, Amrit Pal Singh |
Month |