Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty?

Subject: Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty?
From: drkm <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:21:54 +0100 (CET)
Eric Scheid wrote:

> doing a search at filemaker.com turned up references to
> "XALAN-based" and "XERCES-based".

  Strange.  Xalan 2.7.0:

    ~/drafts/xslt $ cat empty.xsl
    <xsl:transform xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
                   version="1.0">
      <xsl:output method="html"/>
      <xsl:template match="/"><html><br/></html></xsl:template>
    </xsl:transform>
    ~/drafts/xslt $ xalan -XSL empty.xsl -IN empty.xsl
    <html>
    <br>
    </html>
    ~/drafts/xslt $ 

> > Don't this tool permit you to change the XSLT processor to be
> > used?  So you could use a correct implementation.

> sadly no.

  Not so funny :-(

--drkm



















	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
Tilichargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

Current Thread