Subject: Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty? From: drkm <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:21:54 +0100 (CET) |
Eric Scheid wrote: > doing a search at filemaker.com turned up references to > "XALAN-based" and "XERCES-based". Strange. Xalan 2.7.0: ~/drafts/xslt $ cat empty.xsl <xsl:transform xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="1.0"> <xsl:output method="html"/> <xsl:template match="/"><html><br/></html></xsl:template> </xsl:transform> ~/drafts/xslt $ xalan -XSL empty.xsl -IN empty.xsl <html> <br> </html> ~/drafts/xslt $ > > Don't this tool permit you to change the XSLT processor to be > > used? So you could use a correct implementation. > sadly no. Not so funny :-( --drkm ___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Tilichargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Eric Scheid | Thread | Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Eric Scheid |
RE: [xsl] translate quote into quot, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Eric Scheid |
Month |