Subject: RE: [xsl] Learning XSLT: which version? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 01:07:13 -0000 |
> My question: Am I best to: (a) continue to learn 1.0, and then (when > I've mastered it sufficiently), learn to work with 2.0, (b) continue > to learn 1.0 and simply use it (ignoring the new version), or (c) try > to get up to speed on version 2.0 as quickly as possible? > > Obviously a question of opinion...what's yours? Not so much a question of opinion, more a question of the projects you expect to be working on and the attitude of the project managers to technology selection. Faced with the dilemma of "twice the productivity but twice the risk", different projects will (quite rightly) make different decisions. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Learning XSLT: which version?, Scott Rollins | Thread | [xsl] XPath 2.0 function polymorphi, drkm |
RE: [xsl] stylesheet functions or n, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] including content files f, Eric Scheid |
Month |