Subject: Re: [xsl] finding lowest level in ancestor:: axis From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:53:01 GMT |
> But I see the other part of your definition about order, which a > result-tree fragment definitely has. No. A result tree fragment corresponds to a node set with just one node (a root node) in XSLT2 the distinction disappears and in most XSLT1 systems there is a node-set extension function to coerce a result tree fragment back to a node set. But since it _always_ corresponds to a node set with one node (/), ordering is clearly not an issue. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] finding lowest level in a, Dan Vint | Thread | Re: [xsl] finding lowest level in a, G. Ken Holman |
RE: [xsl] filepath of the xml file , Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] filepath of the xml file , Mukul Gandhi |
Month |