Re: [xsl] finding lowest level in ancestor:: axis

Subject: Re: [xsl] finding lowest level in ancestor:: axis
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:53:01 GMT
> But I see the other part of your definition about order, which a
> result-tree fragment  definitely has.

No. A result tree fragment corresponds to a node set with just one node
(a root node) in XSLT2 the distinction disappears and in most XSLT1
systems there is a node-set extension function to coerce a result tree
fragment back to a node set. But since it _always_ corresponds to a node
set with one node (/), ordering is clearly not an issue.

David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

Current Thread