Subject: Re: [xsl] bad match expression From: bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:49:25 +0100 |
Yeah, but my point is that if xquery 1 is based on xpath 2 then xpath 2 was considered worth doing. I suppose then that xpath 2 would be available as its own class, if so it would be easier to build open source xslt 2 projects. cheers, Bryan Rasmussen On 2/9/06, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > If you have Xquery 1.0 doesn't that mean XPath 2 was worth doing? > > http://blogs.msdn.com/xmlteam/archive/2005/06/07/426511.aspx > http://donxml.com/allthingstechie/archive/2005/12/12/2338.aspx > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] bad match expression, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] bad match expression, Terence Kearns |
Re: [xsl] bad match expression, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] help with recursive counter i, Mikael Petterson \(K |
Month |