Subject: Re: [xsl] bad match expression From: Terence Kearns <terence.kearns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:46:37 +1100 |
On 09/02/06, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But if you are talking about libxml in php then you do you mean web > servers rather than web browsers in the first comment? Using saxon8 now > server side is already reasonable, but client side xslt2 support is a > long way off (if it ever happens at all). I can't develop applications exclusively for client-side transformation. I always have to make sure I have a server-based option. If someone put out an "after market" XSLT2 extension for PHP, then at least I can put out an XSLT2 based application that is 100% server-side. I'll be releasing an application next week that uses client-side browsers that support it. This will be based on a HTTP User Agent header with a regular expression (as soon as I develop it). > > Opera is only just now beta testing xslt_1_ support, and while IE6 has > fairly good XSLT1 I don't see much sign of support for XSLT2 (The was a > Microsoft XML team blog thread a while back explictly asking if anyone > thought that XSLT2/XPath2 was worth doing, if you had XSLT1/XPath1 and > XQuery1....) > > David > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] bad match expression, bryan rasmussen | Thread | Re: [xsl] bad match expression, António Mota |
Re: [xsl] Using an XSLT to merge tw, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] Does anyone know how to make , Terence Kearns |
Month |