Subject: Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser transform XML to XHTML using XSLT a good choice? From: "andrew welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:12:35 +0000 |
On 3/2/06, Gowri Ratakonda <gratakonda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andrew, Michael, Nathan, Charles, Jay, > > Thanks a lot for responding to my mail! > I will go with the client-side transformation becuase > Michael suggested that it would be the right way to go > if our goal is to publish dynamic pages. Hmmm if that's the way you've read it ;-) I would still argue perform all transformations server side, with all dynamic client-side functionality done using ajax.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, Gowri Ratakonda | Thread | Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, Robert Koberg |
Re: [xsl] service marks and other s, Craig Whisenhunt | Date | Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, Robert Koberg |
Month |