Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser transform XML to XHTML using XSLT a good choice?

["M. David Peterson" <m.david@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>> given the sheer amount of words that you bestow on this list, i 
wonder why you don't take the time to grab a coffee and relax a little,

btw... I hate to say it, but you ain't seen nothing yet. ;)  Wirting is 
my life -- code, books, blog entries by the dozen, posts to this list 
when not doing the previous three all at the same time.

Dont let that worry you... Its usually enjoyable, and always ignorable 
if the code that it started with served its purpose, and you have no 
need for any of the extended explanations.

Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:

> i'm sorry to see you show an attitude that, were not so verbose, would 
> qualify as thoughtless trolling.
>
> given the sheer amount of words that you bestow on this list, i wonder 
> why you don't take the time to grab a coffee and relax a little, 
> instead of transforming a perfectly valid and well-written (if 
> debatable) counter-argument into a flame-war full of personal abuse.
>
> there are certainly places on the web where such behaviour might be 
> appropriate, but even though i've been enjoying this list for a 
> limited time one i'm sure this is not one of them.
>
> jC6rn
>
>
> M. David Peterson wrote:
>
> > Jesper,
>
>
> > Firstly, you have no idea what you are talking about, and it shows.
>
> <snip>
>
> > It has nothing to do with web sites.  Its has everything to with web
> > browser support, something you have shown through out this thread you
> > know nothing about.
>
> <snip>
>
> > You've taken your misguided opinion, "generalized" it, and used this
> > as the basis for your argument.  Shallow, pointless, useless, get a
> > clue.
>
> <snip>
>
> > For you.  Not for folks who are doing this at the professional level. 
> > If you are doing this at the professional level, then you need to
> > reconcider things... you're flat out, undeniably so far off, its not
> > even funny.
>
> <snip>