RE: [xsl] plea for help...

["Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> As long as I'm already on it, however, I am willing to comment that 
> the scope and difficulty of conversion B is directly related both to 
> the quality of tagging in your source (HTML can be "clean" or 
> "dirty", consistent or messy, even after it's made XML-conformant in 
> its syntax) and, most dramatically, to the nature of your target tag 
> set and to the feasibility of mapping from the HTML you have 
> to this target.

It's also strongly related to the *consistency* of the tagging in your
input. The HTML may be filthy, but if it's all generated by the same tool
and that tool generates filthy HTML consistently, your problem is greatly
reduced.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/