Re: [xsl] Transform xml to html

["Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nick Fitzsimons" <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: [xsl] Transform xml to html


> Joe Fawcett wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "andrew welch" On 3/10/06, Anthony 
> > Ettinger <aettinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > <pre>? ouch.
> > Care to expand on that one... or is it too painful?
> >
> > Yes please let us know what's so bad about it.
> > I know it's deprecated as well as XMP but what's the alternative and why 
> > are they so bad?
> >
> > Joe
>
> You'll be pleased to hear that <pre> isn't deprecated, not even in XHTML 
> 2.0:
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-structural.html#edef_structural_pre>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nick.
> --
> Nick Fitzsimons
> http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
Thanks. I believe that they must have meant "not to be used as a way of 
displaying code".
Next time I'll check myself :)

--

Joe