Subject: Re: [xsl] feasibility of HTML input From: didoss@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:05:43 +0000 |
David - I was hoping not to interfere with the existing outputs,...I can go down that path if this one is not worthwhile. Dianne -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: David Wright <dave-xsl@xxxxxxxx> > > I'm a bit puzzled - a quick google suggests that it isn't hard to get both > JUnit and Emma to produce XML reports, as well as HTML. You'd be much > better off parsing that, than the user-friendly HTML. Is there a reason > why you can't? > > Cheers, > David Wright
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] feasibility of HTML input, Mike Ferrando | Thread | Re: [xsl] feasibility of HTML input, Robert Koberg |
Re: [xsl] Conditional test is faili, Jon Gorman | Date | Re: [xsl] feasibility of HTML input, Robert Koberg |
Month |