Subject: Re: [xsl] descendant-or-self XSLT 1.0 From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:56:39 +0100 (CET) |
George Cristian Bina wrote: > Florent Georges wrote: > > It's not only a bad practice. You MUST NOT use such a > > name. <URL:http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#IDASK3S>: > > This specification does not constrain the semantics, > > use, or (beyond syntax) names of the element types > > and attributes, except that names beginning with a > > match to (('X'|'x')('M'|'m')('L'|'l')) are reserved > > for standardization in this or future versions of > > this specification. > I also thought that such names MUST NOT be used, but then > after a few discussions (on the Xerces list IIRC) I > clarified that such names can be used but it is not > recommended to use them Thanks for the precision. My poor English is to blame, here. I understood than "this specification contraints that names beginning with 'xml' are reserved for standardization", so we can't never use them. Sorry for the noise. Regards, --drkm ___________________________________________________________________________ Nouveau : tiliphonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! Dicouvez les tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international. Tilichargez sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] descendant-or-self XSLT 1, George Cristian Bina | Thread | [xsl] Problem getting position of n, omprakash . v |
Re: [xsl] descendant-or-self XSLT 1, George Cristian Bina | Date | Re: [xsl] descendant-or-self XSLT 1, Florent Georges |
Month |