RE: [xsl] Is Saxon the *only* XSLT 2.0 engine?

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] Is Saxon the only XSLT 2.0 engine?

Subject: RE: [xsl] Is Saxon the *only* XSLT 2.0 engine?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:19:34 +0100

> Bit of a newbie question really, but is Saxon the only XSLT 2.0
> transformation engine available? 

There are two others, Colin Adams' Gestalt XSLT, and Altova's XSLT 2.0
processor.

Saxon, of course, is the best.
  
> ps, I think I'm right in thinking Xalan and XT are all XSLT 1.0?

Yes.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
[xsl] Is Saxon the only XSLT 2.0 engine? Weston, Toby - Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:04:53 +0100 Michael Kay - Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:19:34 +0100 <= <Possible follow-ups> Weston, Toby - Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:15:57 +0100 Colin Paul Adams - 14 Apr 2006 08:38:07 +0100 Dimitre Novatchev - Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:11:31 -0700

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
[xsl] Is Saxon the only XSLT 2.0 , Weston, Toby	Thread	RE: [xsl] Is Saxon the only XSLT , Weston, Toby
Re: [xsl] xupdate and xslt, Jirka Kosek	Date	Re: [xsl] rephrased: passing parame, andrew welch
	Month