Re: [xsl] rephrased: passing parameters to generic templates

Subject: Re: [xsl] rephrased: passing parameters to generic templates
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:43:33 -0400
At 07:59 AM 4/12/2006, Andrew wrote:
If I were using 2.0 I would use a tunnelled parameter that was created
at the <para> matching template and then read in the <a> matching
template, but the OP didnt day whether they could use 2.0 or not....

What would the advantage of this be over the old-fashioned way?


Would we save a few microseconds?

Isn't the direct approach easier to maintain?

Cheers,
Wendell



======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================

Current Thread