Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.0 - errata - E37 From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:31:32 +0200 (CEST) |
"Buchcik, Kasimier" wrote: > I learned that the scope of visibility of an > xsl:param/xsl:variable was reformulated in the errata > http://www.w3.org/1999/11/REC-xslt-19991116-errata/#E37 : > "In this case, the binding is visible for the descendants > of all following siblings that are not xsl:fallback > instructions.". > For me, this sentence seems to exclude the "following siblings" > from the scope; an error in the errata? Interesting question. I'm not an expert of the XSLT 1.0 REC, but I'd say it is more something like "[...] for the following siblings that are not xsl:fallback instructions, and their descendants". It's what the XSLT 2.0 draft says: A local variable binding element is visible for all following siblings and their descendants, with two exceptions: it is not visible in any region where it is shadowed by another variable binding, and it is not visible within the subtree rooted at an xsl:fallback instruction that is a sibling of the variable binding element. The binding is not visible for the xsl:variable or xsl:param element itself. Regards, --drkm ___________________________________________________________________________ Faites de Yahoo! votre page d'accueil sur le web pour retrouver directement vos services prifiris : virifiez vos nouveaux mails, lancez vos recherches et suivez l'actualiti en temps riel. Rendez-vous sur http://fr.yahoo.com/set
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XSLT 1.0 - errata - E37, Buchcik, Kasimier | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.0 - errata - E37, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Stylesheet to output XML , António Mota | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.0 - errata - E37, Michael Kay |
Month |