Subject: RE: [xsl] Namespace-alias using #default with no default namespace in scope From: "Buchcik, Kasimier" <k.buchcik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:16:16 +0200 |
Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > Ah! Is a more recent version of the XSLT 2.0 spec available > > somewhere? I'm currently reading http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20, > > which says: "W3C Candidate Recommendation 3 November 2005". > > That URL always points to the latest. But all the agreed changes are > publicly available as bugzilla entries. I see. [...] > > Couldn't there be a rule, or at least a suggestion in XSLT > > 2.0 to use either the literal namespace prefix or the target > > namespace prefix? > > It's well-defined in XSLT 2.0 which prefix you get. The rule > > "A namespace node whose string value is a target namespace > URI is copied to > the result tree, whether or not the URI identifies an > excluded namespace." > > means that in normal circumstances (that is, when the same namespace > bindings are in scope for the xsl:namespace-alias element and > the literal > result element) you will get the result-prefix. I feel somehow relieved that this was made a rule in XSLT 2.0. Thanks & regards, Kasimier
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Namespace-alias using #de, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Namespace-alias using #de, Buchcik, Kasimier |
RE: [xsl] Namespace-alias using #de, Buchcik, Kasimier | Date | Re: [xsl] Namespace-alias using #de, David Carlisle |
Month |