Subject: Re: [xsl] FO: Non-proportional output with proportional font From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 22:00:49 +0100 |
as others have said,it depends a lot on how general your input tables are. If all rows just take a single line, and there are no spanning entries, converting to a real xsl-fo table would be esay in xslt2 and not too hard in xslt1. If there are multiline or spanning entries like -------------------------------- | this is a long 2 col heading | -------------------------------- | this is | this is short | | a long | | | entry | | -------------------------------- Then probably you should give in and use courier or a different monospace font that doesn't look quite so horrible cmtt is OK for this. Or use some pre-process with perl or somesuch to massage the tables before giving them to xslt. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] FO: Non-proportional output w, Christian Haase | Thread | RE: [xsl] FO: Non-proportional outp, Nathan Young -X \(na |
RE: [xsl] FO: Non-proportional outp, Wendell Piez | Date | [xsl] Collect word count with xslt2, Karen McAdams |
Month |