Subject: Re: [xsl] Transforming Tables - repost From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:27:28 +0100 |
> but if i use this in this input: you mean actually test the code by running it rather than typing it straight into mail messages? that will never catch on... > and the current node is in the cell 1 row 3 then there is > preceding-sibling::cell[1], ?? If you are on the first cell of a row there is no preceding-sibling. Note I'm using preceding-sibling::cell not preceding::cell David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Transforming Tables - rep, Jeff Sese | Thread | Re: [xsl] Transforming Tables - rep, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] Wrapping a Condition arou, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Transforming Tables - rep, David Carlisle |
Month |