Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: <xsl:element> and literal elements From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 21:50:14 +0100 |
> I don't like > the idea of literal text containing angle brackets that turn into > elements in the output data; it seems a little confusing. That would be confusing but isn't what happens. The XSLT stylesheet is a parsed tree of element nodes, and it is (some of these) nodes coming from the literal result elements that get copied to the result tree. If you have text coming from a text node or a string then it doesn't get turned into elements unless you call an extension function to use an xml parser on it. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: <xsl:element> and lit, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: <xsl:element> and lit, M. David Peterson |
RE: [xsl] Re: <xsl:element> and lit, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT v2.0 CR status, Michael Kay |
Month |