Subject: Re: [xsl] Office 2007, XSL-FO, and the Adobe "Save as PDF" From: "M. David Peterson" <xmlhacker@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 13:40:20 -0600 |
What bothers me the most is when people skip over significant pieces of my comments to try and make their point,
Initially, I was hoping to get some general "this is good/bad because ofthis..." kind of thing that Karl provided <
You decided to skip over that part and pull out the pieces in front of and after this to try and suggest something that wasn't the case.
At 12:06 PM -0600 6/3/06, M. David Peterson wrote: >I have been spending countless hours ...
>I have been developing ..
>I have been working directly with Dr. Kay ...
>The "some people" he is refering to is me ...
>I have an open dialogue with Brian Jones ...
>My question, while not really quite this direct, was meant >to (hopefully) suggest to those who have interest in this kind >of thing that a pretty significant opportunity exists here...
>what I am attempting to help bring across here is that opportunity >exists for those of us with interest in XML/XSLT/XSL-FO
So, you didn't really have a question at all. You wanted to promote yourself and push an agenda.
Right?
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
-- <M:D/>
M. David Peterson http://www.xsltblog.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Office 2007, XSL-FO, and , M. David Peterson | Thread | [xsl] Value mapping from different , oknam park |
Re: [xsl] Office 2007, XSL-FO, and , M. David Peterson | Date | Re: [xsl] Office 2007, XSL-FO, and , Robert Koberg |
Month |